GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)
Beam 1.0 vs GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh): 12.4% less intelligence, 377.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 62.3% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.6 | 30.3 | −12.4% Beam 1.0 is 12.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $66.81 | $318.73 | +377.1% Beam 1.0 is 4.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.27s | 8.02s | −62.3% Beam 1.0 is 62.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)Beam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill