GPT-6 Luna (Max) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Max) by OpenAI or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 28.8 points higher (38.1 vs 9.3) but costs 2.8× as much to run the benchmark ($122 vs $44.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). Pick GPT-6 Luna (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Llama 4 Maverick.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Max) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.1 | 9.3 | −75.6% Llama 4 Maverick is 75.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $122.05 | $43.98 | −64.0% Llama 4 Maverick is 64.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 82.02s | 11.18s | −86.4% Llama 4 Maverick is 86.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6 Luna (Max): 75.6% less intelligence, 64.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 86.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-6 Luna (Max)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill