GPT-6 Luna (Max) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Max) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 8.2 points higher (46.3 vs 38.1) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($207 vs $122; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6 Luna (Max).
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Max) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.1 | 46.3 | +21.5% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 21.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $122.05 | $206.66 | +69.3% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 69.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 82.02s | 48.29s | −41.1% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 41.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs GPT-6 Luna (Max): 21.5% more intelligence, 69.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 41.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6 Luna (Max)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill