GPT-6 Sol (High) vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (High) by OpenAI or Ling 3.1 Flash by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Sol (High)
Ling 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol (High): 3.1% less intelligence, 67.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 7.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (High) | Ling 3.1 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.4 | 41.1 | −3.1% Ling 3.1 Flash is 3.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $604.52 | $1,014.56 | +67.8% Ling 3.1 Flash is 67.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.77s | 13.61s | −7.9% Ling 3.1 Flash is 7.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Ling 3.1 Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
GPT-6 Sol (High)Ling 3.1 FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-high/ling-3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-high/ling-3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill