GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs gpt-oss-120b (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or gpt-oss-120b (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) scores 16.9 points higher (28.5 vs 11.6) but costs 3.7× as much to run the benchmark ($449 vs $123; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) when you need intelligence above 11.6, and gpt-oss-120b (High) when 11.6 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) | gpt-oss-120b (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.5 | 11.6 | −59.3% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 59.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $449.37 | $122.71 | −72.7% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 72.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.75s | 11.29s | +96.3% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 96.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
gpt-oss-120b (High) vs GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning): 59.3% less intelligence, 72.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 96.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- gpt-oss-120b (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)gpt-oss-120b (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/gpt-oss-120b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/gpt-oss-120b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill