GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.5 (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Grok 4.5 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.5 (High) scores 10.3 points higher (38.8 vs 28.5) but costs 2.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1244 vs $449; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Grok 4.5 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) | Grok 4.5 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.5 | 38.8 | +36.1% Grok 4.5 (High) is 36.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $449.37 | $1,243.85 | +176.8% Grok 4.5 (High) is 2.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.83s | 19.24s | +230.0% Grok 4.5 (High) is 230.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.5 (High) vs GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning): 36.1% more intelligence, 176.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 230.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Grok 4.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)Grok 4.5 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/grok-4-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/grok-4-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill