GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.6 (Low)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Low) scores 6.6 points higher (35.1 vs 28.5) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($614 vs $449; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Grok 4.6 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.5 | 35.1 | +23.2% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 23.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $449.37 | $613.92 | +36.6% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 36.6% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.52s | 13.02s | +135.9% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 135.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.6 (Low) vs GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning): 23.2% more intelligence, 36.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 135.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)Grok 4.6 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/grok-4-6-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/grok-4-6-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill