GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) scores 10.4 points higher (38.9 vs 28.5) but costs 2.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1185 vs $449; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) | Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.5 | 38.9 | +36.5% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 36.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $449.37 | $1,184.90 | +163.7% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 2.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.83s | 17.34s | +197.4% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 197.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) vs GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning): 36.5% more intelligence, 163.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 197.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/muse-spark-open · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/muse-spark-open?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill