GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) scores 2.0 points higher (28.5 vs 26.5) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($449 vs $286; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nemotron 3.5 Super VL.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.5 | 26.5 | −7.0% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 7.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $449.37 | $286.07 | −36.3% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 36.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.41s | 6.31s | +16.6% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 16.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning): 7.0% less intelligence, 36.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 16.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill