GPT-6 Sol (Max) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Max) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Max) scores 22.4 points higher (47.6 vs 25.2) but costs 3.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1536 vs $428; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Sol (Max) when you need intelligence above 25.2, and Qwen3.7 Plus when 25.2 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Max) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 47.6 | 25.2 | −47.1% Qwen3.7 Plus is 47.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,535.80 | $427.73 | −72.1% Qwen3.7 Plus is 72.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 87.05s | 46.20s | −46.9% Qwen3.7 Plus is 46.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-6 Sol (Max): 47.1% less intelligence, 72.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 46.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-6 Sol (Max)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill