gpt-oss-120b (High) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: gpt-oss-120b (High) by OpenAI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 14.2 points higher (25.8 vs 11.6) but costs 8.1× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $123; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 11.6, and gpt-oss-120b (High) when 11.6 is enough.
| Metric | gpt-oss-120b (High) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.6 | 25.8 | +122.4% Kimi K2.7 Code is 2.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $122.71 | $992.88 | +709.1% Kimi K2.7 Code is 8.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.38s | 46.75s | +277.6% Kimi K2.7 Code is 277.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs gpt-oss-120b (High): 122.4% more intelligence, 709.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 277.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- gpt-oss-120b (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
gpt-oss-120b (High)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill