gpt-oss-120b (high) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: gpt-oss-120b (high) by OpenAI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-19.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 18.9 points higher (43.0 vs 24.1) but costs 5.7× as much to run the benchmark ($545 vs $95.0; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 24.1, and gpt-oss-120b (high) when 24.1 is enough.
| Metric | gpt-oss-120b (high) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.1 | 43.0 | +78.4% Kimi K2.7 Code is 78.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $95.05 | $544.58 | +472.9% Kimi K2.7 Code is 5.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.41s | 75.91s | +362.6% Kimi K2.7 Code is 362.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs gpt-oss-120b (high): 78.4% more intelligence, 472.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 362.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- gpt-oss-120b (high) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (high) scores 47.00 for $55.0.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) scores 56.00 for $485.
gpt-oss-120b (high)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill