gpt-oss-120b (High) vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: gpt-oss-120b (High) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 vs gpt-oss-120b (High): 87.9% more intelligence, 49.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 377.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | gpt-oss-120b (High) | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.6 | 21.8 | +87.9% MiMo-V2.5 is 87.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $122.71 | $61.93 | −49.5% MiMo-V2.5 is 49.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.29s | 53.94s | +377.8% MiMo-V2.5 is 377.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- gpt-oss-120b (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
gpt-oss-120b (High)MiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill