gpt-oss-120b (High) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: gpt-oss-120b (High) by OpenAI or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Glimmer (High) scores 5.9 points higher (17.5 vs 11.6) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($146 vs $123; both mid-range class). Pick Muse Glimmer (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise gpt-oss-120b (High).
| Metric | gpt-oss-120b (High) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.6 | 17.5 | +50.9% Muse Glimmer (High) is 50.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $122.71 | $145.77 | +18.8% Muse Glimmer (High) is 18.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.44s | 24.79s | +116.7% Muse Glimmer (High) is 116.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs gpt-oss-120b (High): 50.9% more intelligence, 18.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 116.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- gpt-oss-120b (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
gpt-oss-120b (High)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill