gpt-oss-20b (High) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: gpt-oss-20b (High) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3 Coder Next scores 0.2 points higher (9.2 vs 9.0) but costs 14× as much to run the benchmark ($405 vs $28.8; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3 Coder Next when you need intelligence above 9.0, and gpt-oss-20b (High) when 9.0 is enough.
| Metric | gpt-oss-20b (High) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.0 | 9.2 | +2.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 2.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $28.81 | $405.10 | +1306.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 14× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.79s | 6.22s | −63.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 63.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.05 / $0.22 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs gpt-oss-20b (High): 2.2% more intelligence, 1306.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 63.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- gpt-oss-20b (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
gpt-oss-20b (High)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-20b/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-20b/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill