gpt-oss-20b (high) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: gpt-oss-20b (high) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3 Coder Next scores 6.2 points higher (21.1 vs 14.9) but costs 8.3× as much to run the benchmark ($247 vs $29.9; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3 Coder Next when you need intelligence above 14.9, and gpt-oss-20b (high) when 14.9 is enough.
| Metric | gpt-oss-20b (high) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.9 | 21.1 | +41.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 41.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $29.87 | $247.26 | +727.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 8.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.00s | 6.61s | −49.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 49.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.05 / $0.20 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs gpt-oss-20b (high): 41.6% more intelligence, 727.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 49.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- gpt-oss-20b (high) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5 scores 37.20 for $25.2.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) scores 45.60 for $240.
gpt-oss-20b (high)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-20b/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-20b/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill