gpt-oss-20b (high) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: gpt-oss-20b (high) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3 Coder Next scores 6.1 points higher (21.3 vs 15.2) but costs 7.7× as much to run the benchmark ($250 vs $32.7; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3 Coder Next when you need intelligence above 15.2, and gpt-oss-20b (high) when 15.2 is enough.
| Metric | gpt-oss-20b (high) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.2 | 21.3 | +40.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 40.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $32.69 | $250.18 | +665.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 7.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.38s | 5.28s | −69.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 69.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.06 / $0.19 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs gpt-oss-20b (high): 40.1% more intelligence, 665.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 69.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- gpt-oss-20b (high) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) scores 38.90 for $21.1.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
gpt-oss-20b (high)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-20b/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-20b/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill