gpt-oss-20b (High) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: gpt-oss-20b (High) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-05.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3 Coder Next scores 0.2 points higher (9.2 vs 9.0) but costs 15× as much to run the benchmark ($476 vs $31.4; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3 Coder Next when you need intelligence above 9.0, and gpt-oss-20b (High) when 9.0 is enough.
| Metric | gpt-oss-20b (High) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.0 | 9.2 | +2.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 2.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $31.41 | $476.23 | +1416.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 15× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.91s | 6.35s | −50.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 50.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.07 / $0.18 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs gpt-oss-20b (High): 2.2% more intelligence, 1416.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 50.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- gpt-oss-20b (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
gpt-oss-20b (High)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-20b/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-20b/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill