Granite 4.2 30B vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: Granite 4.2 30B by IBM or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Granite 4.2 30B scores 3.4 points higher (12.7 vs 9.3) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($111 vs $44.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). Pick Granite 4.2 30B when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Llama 4 Maverick.
| Metric | Granite 4.2 30B | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.7 | 9.3 | −26.8% Llama 4 Maverick is 26.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $110.83 | $43.98 | −60.3% Llama 4 Maverick is 60.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 36.08s | 11.18s | −69.0% Llama 4 Maverick is 69.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.16 / $0.65 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs Granite 4.2 30B: 26.8% less intelligence, 60.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 69.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Granite 4.2 30B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Granite 4.2 30BLlama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill