Granite 4.2 3B vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Granite 4.2 3B by IBM or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 16.7 points higher (25.8 vs 9.1) but costs 67× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $14.9; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 9.1, and Granite 4.2 3B when 9.1 is enough.
| Metric | Granite 4.2 3B | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.1 | 25.8 | +183.5% Kimi K2.7 Code is 2.8× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $14.91 | $992.88 | +6559.2% Kimi K2.7 Code is 67× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.30s | 46.75s | +32.4% Kimi K2.7 Code is 32.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.03 / $0.12 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Granite 4.2 3B: 183.5% more intelligence, 6559.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 32.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Granite 4.2 3B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Granite 4.2 3BKimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-3b/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-3b/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill