Granite 4.2 8B vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: Granite 4.2 8B by IBM or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 35.2 points higher (46.3 vs 11.1) but costs 73× as much to run the benchmark ($3881 vs $53.1; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (High) when you need intelligence above 11.1, and Granite 4.2 8B when 11.1 is enough.
| Metric | Granite 4.2 8B | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.1 | 46.3 | +317.1% Grok 4.7 (High) is 4.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $53.07 | $3,880.88 | +7212.8% Grok 4.7 (High) is 73× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 39.25s | 25.34s | −35.4% Grok 4.7 (High) is 35.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.06 / $0.25 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (High) vs Granite 4.2 8B: 317.1% more intelligence, 7212.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 35.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Granite 4.2 8B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (High) scores 32.90 for $47.9.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Granite 4.2 8BGrok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-8b/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-8b/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill