Granite 4.2 8B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: Granite 4.2 8B by IBM or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL scores 15.4 points higher (26.5 vs 11.1) but costs 5.3× as much to run the benchmark ($283 vs $53.1; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when you need intelligence above 11.1, and Granite 4.2 8B when 11.1 is enough.
| Metric | Granite 4.2 8B | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.1 | 26.5 | +138.7% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 2.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $53.07 | $282.51 | +432.3% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 5.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 63.71s | 6.20s | −90.3% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 90.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.06 / $0.25 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Granite 4.2 8B: 138.7% more intelligence, 432.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 90.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Granite 4.2 8B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (High) scores 32.90 for $47.9.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Granite 4.2 8BNemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-8b/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-8b/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill