Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs MiniMax-M3
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) by SpaceXAI or MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3 scores 15.2 points higher (29.2 vs 14.0) but costs 2.1× as much to run the benchmark ($538 vs $250; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick MiniMax-M3 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | MiniMax-M3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.0 | 29.2 | +108.6% MiniMax-M3 is 2.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $250.37 | $537.98 | +114.9% MiniMax-M3 is 2.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.31s | 25.25s | +300.2% MiniMax-M3 is 300.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $2.50 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
MiniMax-M3 vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning): 108.6% more intelligence, 114.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 300.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)MiniMax-M3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/minimax-m3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/minimax-m3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill