Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) by SpaceXAI or Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Medium 3.5 scores 0.2 points higher (14.2 vs 14.0) but costs 5.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1264 vs $250; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Medium 3.5 when you need intelligence above 14.0, and Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) when 14.0 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.0 | 14.2 | +1.4% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 1.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $250.37 | $1,263.80 | +404.8% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 5.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.31s | 17.85s | +182.9% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 182.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $2.50 | $1.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning): 1.4% more intelligence, 404.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 182.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)Mistral Medium 3.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/mistral-medium-3-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/mistral-medium-3-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill