Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) by SpaceXAI or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 11.2 points higher (25.2 vs 14.0) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($428 vs $250; both mid-range class). Pick Qwen3.7 Plus when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.0 | 25.2 | +80.0% Qwen3.7 Plus is 80.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $250.37 | $427.73 | +70.8% Qwen3.7 Plus is 70.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.31s | 47.00s | +644.8% Qwen3.7 Plus is 644.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $2.50 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning): 80.0% more intelligence, 70.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 644.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill