Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) by SpaceXAI or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) scores 3.2 points higher (14.0 vs 10.8) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($250 vs $233; both mid-range class). Pick Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Trinity Large Thinking.
| Metric | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.0 | 10.8 | −22.9% Trinity Large Thinking is 22.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $250.37 | $232.95 | −7.0% Trinity Large Thinking is 7.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.89s | 8.30s | +40.9% Trinity Large Thinking is 40.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $2.50 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning): 22.9% less intelligence, 7.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 40.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill