Grok 4.3 (High) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.3 (High) by SpaceXAI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 0.9 points higher (25.8 vs 24.9) but costs 2.7× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $363; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Kimi K2.7 Code when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.3 (High).
| Metric | Grok 4.3 (High) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.9 | 25.8 | +3.6% Kimi K2.7 Code is 3.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $363.24 | $992.88 | +173.3% Kimi K2.7 Code is 2.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.88s | 46.75s | +87.9% Kimi K2.7 Code is 87.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $2.50 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Grok 4.3 (High): 3.6% more intelligence, 173.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.3 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Grok 4.3 (High)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill