Grok 4.3 (high) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.3 (high) by SpaceXAI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 5.1 points higher (43.0 vs 37.9) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($545 vs $288; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Kimi K2.7 Code when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.3 (high).
| Metric | Grok 4.3 (high) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.9 | 43.0 | +13.5% Kimi K2.7 Code is 13.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $287.64 | $544.58 | +89.3% Kimi K2.7 Code is 89.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.65s | 66.82s | +171.1% Kimi K2.7 Code is 171.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $2.50 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Grok 4.3 (high): 13.5% more intelligence, 89.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 171.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.3 (high) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
Grok 4.3 (high)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill