Grok 4.3 (High) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.3 (High) by SpaceXAI or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.3 (High) scores 7.4 points higher (24.9 vs 17.5) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($363 vs $146; both mid-range class). Pick Grok 4.3 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Glimmer (High).
| Metric | Grok 4.3 (High) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.9 | 17.5 | −29.7% Muse Glimmer (High) is 29.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $363.24 | $145.77 | −59.9% Muse Glimmer (High) is 59.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.84s | 24.78s | −11.0% Muse Glimmer (High) is 11.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $2.50 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Grok 4.3 (High): 29.7% less intelligence, 59.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 11.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.3 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Grok 4.3 (High)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill