Grok 4.5 (High) vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.5 (High) by SpaceXAI or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 7.5 points higher (46.3 vs 38.8) but costs 3.1× as much to run the benchmark ($3881 vs $1244; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (High) when you need intelligence above 38.8, and Grok 4.5 (High) when 38.8 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.5 (High) | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.8 | 46.3 | +19.3% Grok 4.7 (High) is 19.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,243.85 | $3,880.88 | +212.0% Grok 4.7 (High) is 3.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.45s | 26.80s | +37.8% Grok 4.7 (High) is 37.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (High) vs Grok 4.5 (High): 19.3% more intelligence, 212.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 37.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Grok 4.5 (High)Grok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-5/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-5/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill