Grok 4.5 (High) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.5 (High) by SpaceXAI or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Grok 4.5 (High)
Qwen3.7 Max vs Grok 4.5 (High): 24.0% less intelligence, 83.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 11.7% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Grok 4.5 (High) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.8 | 29.5 | −24.0% Qwen3.7 Max is 24.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,243.85 | $2,277.12 | +83.1% Qwen3.7 Max is 83.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.82s | 16.61s | −11.7% Qwen3.7 Max is 11.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Grok 4.5 (High)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-5/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-5/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill