Grok 4.5 (High) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.5 (High) by SpaceXAI or Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Grok 4.5 (High)
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) vs Grok 4.5 (High): 13.1% less intelligence, 7.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 204.4% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Grok 4.5 (High) | Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.8 | 33.7 | −13.1% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 13.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,243.85 | $1,336.09 | +7.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 7.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.63s | 59.76s | +204.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 204.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Grok 4.5 (High)Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-5/qwen3-8-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-5/qwen3-8-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill