Grok 4.6 (Low) vs Grok 4.6 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) scores 9.1 points higher (44.2 vs 35.1) but costs 3.7× as much to run the benchmark ($2242 vs $614; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 35.1, and Grok 4.6 (Low) when 35.1 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.1 | 44.2 | +25.9% Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) is 25.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $613.92 | $2,241.91 | +265.2% Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) is 3.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.22s | 39.83s | +201.3% Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) is 201.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) vs Grok 4.6 (Low): 25.9% more intelligence, 265.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 201.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Grok 4.6 (Low)Grok 4.6 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/grok-4-6-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/grok-4-6-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill