Grok 4.6 (Low) vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 11.2 points higher (46.3 vs 35.1) but costs 6.3× as much to run the benchmark ($3881 vs $614; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (High) when you need intelligence above 35.1, and Grok 4.6 (Low) when 35.1 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.1 | 46.3 | +31.9% Grok 4.7 (High) is 31.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $613.92 | $3,880.88 | +532.1% Grok 4.7 (High) is 6.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.47s | 30.44s | +110.4% Grok 4.7 (High) is 110.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (High) vs Grok 4.6 (Low): 31.9% more intelligence, 532.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 110.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Grok 4.6 (Low)Grok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill