Grok 4.6 (Low) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI or MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Low) scores 9.1 points higher (35.1 vs 26.0) but costs 2.7× as much to run the benchmark ($614 vs $231; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Grok 4.6 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning).
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Low) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.1 | 26.0 | −25.9% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 25.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $613.92 | $231.08 | −62.4% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 62.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.64s | 49.64s | +263.9% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 263.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.41 / $1.02 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Grok 4.6 (Low): 25.9% less intelligence, 62.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 263.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Grok 4.6 (Low)MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill