Grok 4.6 (Low) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Grok 4.6 (Low): 31.9% more intelligence, 66.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 243.4% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Low) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.1 | 46.3 | +31.9% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 31.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $613.92 | $206.66 | −66.3% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 66.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.64s | 46.84s | +243.4% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 243.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Grok 4.6 (Low)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill