Grok 4.6 (Low) vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) scores 4.5 points higher (39.6 vs 35.1) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1385 vs $614; both premium class). Pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.6 (Low).
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.1 | 39.6 | +12.8% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 12.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $613.92 | $1,385.40 | +125.7% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.64s | 20.60s | +51.0% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 51.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs Grok 4.6 (Low): 12.8% more intelligence, 125.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 51.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Grok 4.6 (Low)Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill