Grok 4.6 (Low) vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Grok 4.6 (Low)
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) vs Grok 4.6 (Low): 55.6% less intelligence, 7.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 60.6% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.1 | 15.6 | −55.6% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 55.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $613.92 | $661.29 | +7.7% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 7.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.31s | 21.37s | +60.6% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 60.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.40 / $3.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Grok 4.6 (Low)Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/qwen3-5-122b-a10b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/qwen3-5-122b-a10b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill