Grok 4.6 (Low) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Grok 4.6 (Low)
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.6 (Low): 42.5% less intelligence, 229.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 5.1% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.1 | 20.2 | −42.5% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 42.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $613.92 | $2,022.49 | +229.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 3.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.17s | 13.84s | +5.1% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 5.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Grok 4.6 (Low)Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill