Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) vs Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI or Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) scores 2.2 points higher (46.4 vs 44.2) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($4967 vs $2242; both flagship class). Pick Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.6 (Xhigh).
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) | Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.2 | 46.4 | +5.0% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 5.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,241.91 | $4,967.35 | +121.6% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 2.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 37.86s | 46.09s | +21.7% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 21.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) vs Grok 4.6 (Xhigh): 5.0% more intelligence, 121.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 21.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Grok 4.6 (Xhigh)Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-xhigh/grok-4-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-xhigh/grok-4-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill