Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) scores 18.4 points higher (44.2 vs 25.8) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($2242 vs $993; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.7 Code.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.2 | 25.8 | −41.6% Kimi K2.7 Code is 41.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,241.91 | $992.88 | −55.7% Kimi K2.7 Code is 55.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 32.45s | 46.75s | +44.1% Kimi K2.7 Code is 44.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Grok 4.6 (Xhigh): 41.6% less intelligence, 55.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 44.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Grok 4.6 (Xhigh)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-xhigh/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-xhigh/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill