Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) vs Kimi K3 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI or Kimi K3 (Low) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) scores 14.1 points higher (44.2 vs 30.1) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($2242 vs $1190; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K3 (Low).
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) | Kimi K3 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.2 | 30.1 | −31.9% Kimi K3 (Low) is 31.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,241.91 | $1,190.42 | −46.9% Kimi K3 (Low) is 46.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 37.86s | 51.29s | +35.5% Kimi K3 (Low) is 35.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $3.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3 (Low) vs Grok 4.6 (Xhigh): 31.9% less intelligence, 46.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 35.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Kimi K3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Grok 4.6 (Xhigh)Kimi K3 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-xhigh/kimi-k3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-xhigh/kimi-k3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill