Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) scores 1.5 points higher (44.2 vs 42.7) but costs 7.9× as much to run the benchmark ($2242 vs $283; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 42.7, and MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when 42.7 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.2 | 42.7 | −3.4% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 3.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,241.91 | $283.18 | −87.4% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 87.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 40.33s | 21.66s | −46.3% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 46.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Grok 4.6 (Xhigh): 3.4% less intelligence, 87.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 46.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Grok 4.6 (Xhigh)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-xhigh/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-xhigh/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill