Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI or Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) scores 30.0 points higher (44.2 vs 14.2) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($2242 vs $1264; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mistral Medium 3.5.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.2 | 14.2 | −67.9% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 67.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,241.91 | $1,263.80 | −43.6% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 43.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 37.86s | 17.90s | −52.7% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 52.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $1.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Grok 4.6 (Xhigh): 67.9% less intelligence, 43.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 52.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Grok 4.6 (Xhigh)Mistral Medium 3.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-xhigh/mistral-medium-3-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-xhigh/mistral-medium-3-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill