Grok 4.6 (High) vs Grok 4.7 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (High) by SpaceXAI or Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (High) scores 2.1 points higher (44.3 vs 42.2) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1963 vs $1631; both premium class). Pick Grok 4.6 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.7 (Low).
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (High) | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.3 | 42.2 | −4.7% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 4.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,962.90 | $1,630.69 | −16.9% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 16.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.57s | 12.90s | −63.7% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 63.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Grok 4.6 (High): 4.7% less intelligence, 16.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 63.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Grok 4.6 (High)Grok 4.7 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill