Grok 4.6 (High) vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (High) by SpaceXAI or Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (High) scores 10.6 points higher (44.3 vs 33.7) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($1963 vs $1737; both premium class). Pick Grok 4.6 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh).
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (High) | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.3 | 33.7 | −23.9% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 23.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,962.90 | $1,737.18 | −11.5% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 11.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.57s | 21.59s | −39.3% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 39.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs Grok 4.6 (High): 23.9% less intelligence, 11.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 39.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Grok 4.6 (High)Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6/muse-spark-1-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6/muse-spark-1-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill