Grok 4.7 (High) vs Kimi K3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI or Kimi K3 (Max) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 2.7 points higher (46.3 vs 43.6) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($3881 vs $3658; both flagship class). Pick Grok 4.7 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K3 (Max).
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (High) | Kimi K3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 43.6 | −5.8% Kimi K3 (Max) is 5.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,880.88 | $3,658.07 | −5.7% Kimi K3 (Max) is 5.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.34s | 56.93s | +124.7% Kimi K3 (Max) is 124.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $3.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3 (Max) vs Grok 4.7 (High): 5.8% less intelligence, 5.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 124.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Kimi K3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Grok 4.7 (High)Kimi K3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-high/kimi-k3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-high/kimi-k3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill