Grok 4.7 (High) vs Muse Ember (Max)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI or Muse Ember (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Ember (Max)
Muse Ember (Max) vs Grok 4.7 (High): 2.3% more intelligence, 97.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (High) | Muse Ember (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.2 | 36.0 | +2.3% Muse Ember (Max) is 2.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,721.61 | $117.12 | −97.5% Muse Ember (Max) is 97.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 37.86s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) scores 56.40 for $3360.
- Muse Ember (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Grok 4.7 (High)Muse Ember (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-high/muse-ember · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-high/muse-ember?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill