Grok 4.7 (High) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 1.2 points higher (46.3 vs 45.1) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($3881 vs $1655; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Grok 4.7 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh).
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (High) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 45.1 | −2.6% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 2.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,880.88 | $1,655.27 | −57.3% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 57.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 42.17s | 28.35s | −32.8% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 32.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs Grok 4.7 (High): 2.6% less intelligence, 57.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 32.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Grok 4.7 (High)Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-high/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-high/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill