Grok 4.7 (High) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 33.6 points higher (46.3 vs 12.7) but costs 15× as much to run the benchmark ($3473 vs $234; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (High) when you need intelligence above 12.7, and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) when 12.7 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (High) | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 12.7 | −72.6% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 72.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,473.49 | $233.56 | −93.3% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 93.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 51.23s | 21.63s | −57.8% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 57.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.23 / $2.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Grok 4.7 (High): 72.6% less intelligence, 93.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 57.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Grok 4.7 (High)Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-high/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-high/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill